Curb-to-Gate Passenger Journey

End-to-end visibility of passenger movement for real-time flow, SLA, and operational optimisation.

Banner
Immigration & Border Control
Baggage Reclaim
Landside & Check-In
Security Checkpoint

Immigration & Border Control

Departure Immigration & Border Control

Immigration is a critical stabiliser in the curb-to-gate journey. A predictable, well-managed border control process protects passenger buffer time, reduces downstream congestion, and supports smoother airside operations. The challenge, however, lies not in hardware or staffing alone, it is the variability: sudden inbound surges, uneven lane productivity, fluctuating E-gate performance, and queues that behave differently at high load.

FootfallCam provides a unified operational view purpose-built for immigration teams. Every queue, counter, and E-gate is measured with minute-by-minute accuracy to reveal flow rates, cycle times, and stability across the zone. Designed for high-density environments, the system integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure and delivers clear, real-time visibility that supports staffing decisions, peak management, and SLA compliance. This ensures a more reliable, consistent, and accountable immigration experience for all passengers.

Airport Immigration & Border Control

The Dashboard for Immigration Authority

Immigration Performance Dashboard
Live Operations
Lane Regulation
Counter Performance

Immigration Performance Dashboard

Immigration Performance Dashboard

Immigration Performance Dashboard

Immigration teams need one thing: a live, unified operational truth. This dashboard consolidates queue length, P95 wait time, E-gate throughput, manual booth performance, and overspill alerts into a single real-time view. Every widget is designed to support fast, informed decisions, especially during peak-load periods.

Live Operations

Live Operations Dashboard

Live Operations Dashboard

Provides a real-time view of all border checkpoints, displaying current queue lengths, estimated wait times, lane utilisation, and critical alerts. It equips operations teams to react instantly to rising congestion or system issues, ensuring a smooth, continuous flow of inbound travellers and timely intervention when required.

Lane Regulation

Lane Regulation Dashboard

Lane Regulation Dashboard

Tracks performance of each immigration lane in use - lane occupancy, throughput, P95 waiting time, and lane-specific delays. Helps allocate lanes dynamically to balance load, reduce waiting times, and optimise lane utilisation.

Counter Performance

Counter Performance Dashboard

Counter Performance Dashboard

Monitors throughput at manual counters and e-gates, including travellers processed per hour, lane idle time, and developing backlogs. It provides a clear measure of staff efficiency and overall service performance, helping identify bottlenecks and guide decisions on balancing the opening or closing of different lane types.

Immigration P95 Wait Time

P95 wait time represents the experience of the slowest 5% of passengers - the group most affected by delays, service variability, and missed travel buffers. As the central KPI for immigration performance, it is refreshed every minute using live sensor data. All other metrics help explain, stabilise, and improve this number.

Key Metrics Captured at Immigration

Queue Heatmap (15-minute granularity)

Queue Heatmap (15-minute granularity)

Reveals flow surges, stability, and queue spillover patterns.

Manual vs E-Gate Throughput

Manual vs E-Gate Throughput

Evaluates operational balance between lanes and quantifies processing gaps.

Lane Cycle Time Consistency

Lane Cycle Time Consistency

Shows counter efficiency and identifies inconsistent procedures.

Overspill Risk Projection

Overspill Risk Projection

Predicts queue breaches before they occur, designed for APOC and real-time resourcing.

Hourly Demand Forecast (Next 120 Minutes)

Hourly Demand Forecast (Next 120 Minutes)

Forecasts passenger load using flight mix and observed flow rates.

Airport Solutions for Immigration

Small Airports

Starting at

$8,000

Approx. 150 - 400m2

  • Typical throughput: < 3 million passengers/year
  • 2-6 manual counters
  • Possibly 1–2 e-gates (if available)
  • Compact queuing zone
  • Requires 9-10 devices to cover the area
Small Airports

Medium-Sized Airports

Starting at

$16,000

Approx. 400–1,200m2

  • Typical throughput: 3–15 million passengers/year
  • 6–16 manual counters, 4–10 e-gates
  • Larger serpentine queue area
  • Sometimes with fast-track or crew lane
  • Requires around 20 devices
Medium-Sized Airports

Large International Airports

Starting at

$24,000

Approx. 1,500-4,000m2 (or above)

  • Typical throughput: > 20–40+ million passengers/year
  • 20–50+ manual counters, 10–40 e-gates
  • Multiple zones for nationality, transfer, crew, fast-track
  • Requires 30-40 devices
Large International Airports

Case Study

Peak Queue Stabilisation
Off-Peak Right-Sizing
Hidden Flow Bottleneck

Peak Queue Stabilisation

Case Study 1

Stabilising Peak-Hour Queues During Flight Banks

Context

An international airport with three daily arrival banks experienced volatile queue lengths at immigration. Despite adequate staffing, uneven distribution of passengers to counters resulted in sudden spikes.

Challenge

Supervisors could only respond after the queue had already formed, relying on manual observation and radio communication. This led to inconsistent P95 waiting times and passenger dissatisfaction during the morning peak.

Action Using the System

  • Real-time dashboards highlighted Booth Group B repeatedly exceeding the 20-minute queue threshold.
  • Lane utilisation heatmaps showed underused automated gates during the same window.
  • The system recommended redeploying one marshal to redirect eligible passengers to e-gates.

Outcome

  • P95 waiting time reduced from 28 minutes → 17 minutes within two days.
  • SLA compliance (≤15 mins) increased from 84% → 94%.
  • The airport established a new standard operating procedure based on the system’s continuous alerts.

Immediate Value

Operational teams gained a live, evidence-backed method to prevent queue build-up rather than reacting after failure.

Off-Peak Right-Sizing

Case Study 2

Eliminating Overstaffing in Off-Peak Periods Context

Context

A mid-sized Asian airport staffed immigration counters uniformly throughout the day, even during the low-traffic midnight hours.

Challenge

Actual processing demand after 23:00 was far lower than planned. The airport wanted to reduce cost without risking long wait times.

Action Using the System

  • Historical path reconstruction showed hourly throughput dropping by 62% after 23:00.
  • Staff utilisation dashboards revealed only 40% utilisation of open manual counters.
  • Forecasting module recommended closing 3 counters while maintaining SLA protection.

Outcome

  • Staff requirement reduced by 3 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) per night shift.
  • Annualised labour savings: USD 210,000.
  • SLA compliance remained consistently above 96%.

Immediate Value

Operational teams gained a live, evidence-backed method to prevent queue build-up rather than reacting after failure.

Hidden Flow Bottleneck

Case Study 3

Identifying a Hidden Bottleneck in Queue Flow

Context

A European airport experienced fluctuating queues despite having many counters open. Operators assumed it was due to flight arrival variability.

Challenge

Passenger surveys highlighted frustration at slow-moving lines, but staff could not identify the exact cause. Queue length was manageable, but movement inside the queue was irregular.

Action Using the System

  • The point-cloud playback and heatmap showed a stagnation zone caused by a poorly positioned stanchion.
  • Movement density revealed a 30% slowdown where passengers converged before the queue split into manual and e-gate streams.
  • Supervisors adjusted the barrier layout and added a directional marshal.

Outcome

  • Average waiting time reduced by 9 minutes without opening any additional counters.
  • Passenger flow became smoother, with 13% fewer stop-start movements.
  • Complaints related to immigration queue dropped significantly during the following month.

Immediate Value

Operational teams corrected a structural bottleneck that was invisible to manual observation.

Baggage Reclaim

Baggage Reclaim

Baggage reclaim is the final phase of the passenger journey, where delays and congestion directly shape the airport's last impression. Issues such as late baggage delivery, carousel overcrowding, or operational slowdowns can quickly erode passenger satisfaction and disrupt the flow toward customs and exit.

FootfallCam Baggage Reclaim Analytics provides a unified view of what happens between aircraft on-blocks and passengers leaving the hall. Using Pro1/Pro2 devices and Centroid analytics, the system measures baggage delivery performance, passenger waiting time, area occupancy, and staffing efficiency. Operators gain real-time visibility of reclaim load, spot crowded zones or idle periods, and intervene early when bottlenecks emerge. The outcome: smoother baggage delivery, reduced waiting, optimised staffing, and a consistently positive end-of-journey experience.

Baggage Reclaim

The Dashboards for Baggage Handlers Authority

Executive Overview
Live Operations
Operational Review
Staffing Planner

Executive Overview

Executive Overview Dashboard

Executive Overview Dashboard

Executive overview: High-level baggage reclaim performance in a single view, showing first/last-bag SLA compliance, passenger waiting time and terminal health so executives can see if operations are on track at a glance.

Live Operations

Live Operations Dashboard

Live Operations Dashboard

Live operations: Real-time status of each belt, crowding and bag flow, with alerts and short recommendations to help duty staff act immediately during arrival waves.

Operational Review

Operational Review Dashboard

Operational Review Dashboard

Operational review: Flight-by-flight timelines of aircraft, bags and passengers, highlighting root causes of delays so supervisors can separate baggage issues from early passenger arrival, equipment faults or staffing.

Staffing Planner

Staff Planner Dashboard

Staff Planner Dashboard

Staffing planner: Seven-day forecast of load versus rostered staff, identifying under- and over-staffed windows to support evidence-based manpower planning for baggage reclaim.

Passenger Arrival-to-Exit P95 Time

Measures the time from when a passenger enters the reclaim hall until they exit with their bags. It reflects the passenger experience end-to-end, capturing delays such as late belt activation, slow unloading, or oversized baggage waits. P95 highlights extreme delays, showing tail events beyond average times, making it the most passenger-focused metric for airport performance.

Key Metrics Captured at Baggage Reclaim

On-blocks → First Bag (P95)

On-blocks → First Bag (P95)

Time from aircraft parking until first bag on belt, measuring SLA compliance and waiting time.

On-blocks → Last Bag (P95)

On-blocks → Last Bag (P95)

Time from aircraft parking to last bag delivery, tracking overall unloading efficiency.

Passenger Dwell P95

Passenger Dwell P95

95% of the passenger waiting time at the belt, indicating passenger experience.

Bag Arrival Curve

Bag Arrival Curve

Rate of bags arriving per minute on the belt, highlighting slowdowns or potential jams.

Belt Stoppage Time

Belt Stoppage Time

Total duration the belt is inactive, monitoring equipment reliability and operational health.

Crowding Index

Crowding Index

Percentage of time the belt area is overcrowded, helping control congestion and improve flow

Airport Solutions for Baggage Reclaim

Airports of Any Sizes

Starting at

$2,400

Approx. 300–600m² (or above)

  • Typical throughput: 800–2,500 passengers/hour
  • Pro2 / Pro1 cameras positioned to monitor defined sections of each conveyor belt for bag flow, belt movement, and stoppage analysis.
  • Deployment density: 1 device per 2–3 baggage belts, depending on belt length and visibility.
Airport Solutions for Baggage Reclaim

Case Study

Early Arrival Insight
Staffing Load Optimised
Hidden Stoppage Detection

Early Arrival Insight

Case Study 1

Identifying Early Passenger Arrival as the Root Cause

Context

Large European hub airport (35M pax/year) experiencing repeated complaints about long waiting times at two reclaim belts during evening wide-body arrivals.

Challenge

The airport experienced recurring complaints about long waiting times at two reclaim belts during wide-body evening arrivals. Ground handling insisted baggage delivery was on time.

Action Using the System

The Operational Review dashboard revealed passengers were reaching the hall 6–9 minutes earlier than the model baseline due to short walking routes and smooth immigration clearance.

Outcome

  • Ground handling was cleared of blame; complaint escalations ceased.
  • Airport updated staff positioning at the hall to manage early passenger surges.
  • “Unexplained delays” dropped by over 60% because root causes became clear.

Immediate Value

Clear operational transparency and quick resolution of root-cause disputes.

Staffing Load Optimised

Case Study 2

Reducing Over-Staffing During Low-Load Waves

Context

Medium-sized Southeast Asian airport (18M pax/year) with historically conservative staffing in reclaim halls.

Challenge

The airport historically staffed reclaim halls conservatively, leading to high labour cost during quiet mid-day periods.

Action Using the System

The Staffing Planner heatmap revealed repeated over-staffed windows (index > 1.20) from 11:00–14:00 across all terminals.

Outcome

  • Rosters were adjusted to reassign two handlers per shift.
  • No reduction in SLA performance or congestion.
  • Annualised manpower savings of 8–10% across reclaim operations.

Immediate Value

Measurable cost improvement without degrading passenger experience.

Hidden Stoppage Detection

Case Study 3

Detecting Hidden Belt Stoppages Impacting SLA

Context

A major Middle Eastern hub (40M pax/year) noted recurring first-bag SLA breaches for certain airlines.

Challenge

Airlines claimed normal offload times, yet first-bag delivery was consistently 5–7 minutes late, and staff could not visually identify the cause.

Action Using the System

The system detected short, repeated belt stoppages (20–40 seconds each) caused by a worn motor component. These stoppages were too small to be noticed visually by staff.

Outcome

  • Maintenance replaced components proactively.
  • First-bag SLA compliance improved from 82% → 94% within one week.
  • Better relationships with airlines due to factual RCA.

Immediate Value

Equipment issues surfaced quickly, preventing recurring SLA failures.

Landside & Check-In

Landside & Check-In

Airport check-in halls are some of the most complex and dynamic environments in the terminal. Large, unstructured spaces, open-plan layouts, high passenger volumes, and drifting queue formations make it nearly impossible for legacy queue systems to deliver reliable insights. Airports cannot manage what they cannot measure.

FootfallCam provides accurate, real-time visibility into queue formation, wait times, counter performance, and SLA compliance. By delivering ground-truth measurements, not estimates, the system enables airports to maintain service levels, optimise counter allocation, identify bottlenecks, and support operational decisions with factual evidence. This brings precision and control to an area where conventional tools consistently fail.

Baggage Reclaim

The Dashboards for Check-In Authority

Live Waiting Time
Check-In Hall Performance
Airport Management Review
Airline Weekly Check-In Performance

Live Waiting Time Dashboard

Live Waiting Time Dashboard

Live Waiting Time Dashboard

Optimised for real-time monitoring (updated every 3-5 secs).

  • Join Wait (expected wait for a new entrant)
  • Counter Service Rate & Capacity Deficit
  • Recovery Time Estimate after backlog
  • Breach-in-X-minutes prediction
  • Active Airlines in Hall and their immediate performance windows

This view is role-aligned to ground staff responsible for immediate intervention and rapid counter deployment.

Check-In Hall Performance

Check-In Hall Performance

Hall Performance Dashboard

Designed for supervisory control of the entire hall (Updated every 30-60 secs.)

  • Full hall queues - per airline / bank / row
  • Counter opening discipline: late opens, early closes, under-staffed positions
  • Service variance analysis (processing time deviations)
  • Comparative airline performance baselines
  • Rolling hourly demand curve vs capacity

This dashboard acts as the operational “black box” for the check-in hall, enabling consistent performance governance.

Airport Management Review

Airport Management Review

Airport Management Review Dashboard

A structured, neutral report summarising:

  • SLA compliance
  • Number, size, severity of breach episodes
  • Passenger volume distribution vs allocated counters
  • Recovery time behaviour
  • Queue stability (QSI trends, drift episodes)
  • Comparisons to peer carriers
  • Root-cause analysis and recommendations

Designed to support constructive review between airport operator, ground handler and airline.

Airline Weekly Check-In Performance

Airline Weekly Check-In Performance

Airline Weekly Check-In Performance

Provides a comprehensive airline review:

  • Flight-bank performance patterns
  • Day-of-week behavioural differences
  • Structural staffing issues (roster alignment)
  • Shared-counter friction patterns
  • Multi-week SLA heatmaps
  • High-impact breach catalogue
  • Recommendations for resource planning

This level is intended for infrastructure planning, contractual review, and operational assurance.

End-to-End Passenger Processing Time

This metric quantifies the total elapsed time from a passenger joining the check-in queue to the completion of counter processing. It integrates queue progression rate, service rate per counter, counter availability, queue geometry drift, and staffing assignment. By correlating passenger arrival curves with actual processing throughput, it exposes capacity shortfalls, micro-stoppages, lane imbalance, and counter under-utilisation. The metric acts as the governing indicator for forecasting congestion, validating SLA adherence, and detecting systemic inefficiencies across airlines, counter groups, and time periods. It provides a single, technical reference point for diagnosing whether the check-in hall is operating within planned operational capacity.

Key Metrics Captured at Check-In Hall

Icon - Queue Length

Queue Length

Measures number of passengers waiting in each airline queue at any moment.

Icon - Estimated Waiting Time

Estimated Waiting Time

Predicts how long passengers will wait based on real-time forward progression.

Icon - Actives Assigned Counters

Active vs Assigned Counters

Shows how many counters are staffed and processing passengers per airline.

Icon - Counter Throughput

Counter Throughput

Measures passengers processed per counter per hour for performance comparison.

Icon - Passenger Arrival Rate

Passenger Arrival Rate

Tracks how many passengers enter the check-in area per minute.

Icon - Processing Arrival Rate

Processing vs Arrival Rate

Compares service capacity to incoming demand to identify imbalance.

Airport Solutions for Check-In Hall

Small Airports

Starting at

$8,000

Approx. 150 - 400m2

  • Typical throughput: < 3 million passengers/year
  • 2-6 Economy counters, 1-2 Business-Class counter if available
  • Compact single-zone check-in
  • Requires 8–10 devices
Small Airports

Medium-Sized Airports

Starting at

$12,000

Approx. 400–1,200m2

  • Typical throughput: 3-15 million passengers/year
  • 6-16 Economy counters, 4-10 Business-Class/First Class counters
  • Multi-island hall with dynamic counter allocation
  • Requires 15–30 devices
Medium Sized Airports

Large International Airports

Starting at

$32,000

Approx. 1,500-4,000m2 (or above)

  • Typical throughput: > 20 million passengers/year
  • 20-50+ Economy counters, 10-20 Business-Class/First Class/Frequent Flyers counters
  • Full terminal coverage with multi-zones
  • Requires 40-50 devices
Large International Airports

Case Study

Improving Predictability
Strengthening Governance

Improving Predictability

Case Study 1

APOC receiving late escalation from security

Challenge

Airports with centralised operations centres rely on security to provide early warnings. However, the checkpoint team often escalated only after a queue breached the SLA, limiting the APOC’s ability to rebalance flows or coordinate with airlines.

What FootfallCam Measured

  • Short-horizon wait-time projections (15–30 minutes)
  • Demand–capacity mismatch indicators
  • Impact of inbound flight banks on checkpoint load
  • Trends across multiple days showing repeatable patterns

Outcome

Monthly performance reviews became more structured:

  • Issues were categorised into forecast, staffing, process, equipment, or external
  • Management could see which corrective actions had the highest return
  • Stakeholders could differentiate avoidable issues from those driven by circumstances

Strengthening Governance

Case Study 2

Monthly SLA reports lacked granularity

Challenge

Senior management received a high-level SLA figure (“% processed within 10 minutes”), but root causes were unclear. Some breaches appeared unavoidable; others seemed operational. Without detailed attribution, improvement efforts were difficult to target.

What FootfallCam Measured

  • Each breach window with precise queue metrics
  • Staffing levels vs planned rosters
  • Lane performance against expected service rate
  • Correlation with equipment downtime and security alerts
  • Airline exposure and impact windows

Outcome

Monthly performance reviews became more structured:

  • Issues were categorised into forecast, staffing, process, equipment, or external
  • Management could see which corrective actions had the highest return
  • Stakeholders could differentiate avoidable issues from those driven by circumstances

This led to fewer escalations, clearer planning discussions, and a more stable checkpoint environment.

Security Checkpoint

Security Checkpoint

Security screening is a mandatory step in the departure journey, governed by national aviation regulations and international standards. Airports must balance two conflicting priorities: strict compliance with security procedures and maintaining stable passenger flow to prevent excessive queues, missed connections, and operational disruptions.

FootfallCam provides airports with a measurement and monitoring layer across the security checkpoint, enabling operators and contractors to make informed, timely decisions based on objective data. The system does not alter security protocol. Instead, it gives full visibility of throughput, lane performance, demand patterns, staff deployment, and service levels, allowing both the airport and the contracted security provider to maintain consistency and meet service obligations.

Baggage Reclaim

The Dashboards for Security Checkpoint Authority

Live Security Control
Terminal Supervisor
Management & Governance Report

Live Security Control

Live Checkpoint Control

Security Screening: Live Security Control

Each lane is measured individually to highlight operational characteristics:

  • Service rate (pax/hr)
  • Utilisation level
  • Impact of alarms and secondary checks
  • Timing of lane opening and closing
  • Changes in performance during peak periods

Support a clearer understanding of operational constraints, allowing supervisors to respond quickly and allocate resources effectively.

Terminal Supervisor

Terminal Supervisor Dashboard

Security Screening: Terminal Supervisor

Supervisors can view live conditions at each checkpoint and anticipate upcoming peaks. The system provides:

  • Live queue status and expected wait times
  • Forecasts for the next 15–30 minutes
  • Alerts when demand approaches capacity
  • Indicators for lane optimisation and load balancing

This enables quicker decisions during high-traffic periods and supports the smooth flow of passengers through the terminal.

Management & Governance Report

Management and Governance Report

Management & Governance Report

Comprehensive reporting tools summarise checkpoint performance:

  • Daily and monthly SLA compliance
  • Time periods with elevated wait times
  • Attribution of performance impacts (staffing, demand, equipment)
  • Process-level insights for divest, screening and recomposure
  • Airline impact summaries

Support routine operational reviews and long-term planning discussions with contractors, airlines and regulatory bodies.

Operational Visibility Across the Checkpoint

FootfallCam monitors passenger movement throughout the screening area, delivering real-time and historical insights for:

  • Queue length and wait times
  • Passenger arrival patterns
  • Throughput per lane
  • Divest, screening and recomposure timing
  • Lane utilisation and availability

This provides a consistent view of checkpoint performance, helping teams maintain stable service levels throughout the day.

Key Metrics Captured at Security Checkpoint

Icon - Queue Length

Queue Length

Measures the number of passengers waiting to be processed at any moment.

Icon - Average Waiting Time

Average Waiting Time

Tracks how long passengers typically wait before reaching the processing point.

Icon - Incoming Passengers

Incoming Passengers

Counts all arriving passengers entering the immigration or checkpoint area.

Icon - Throughput Per Lane

Throughput per Lane

Measures how many passengers each lane processes within a set timeframe.

Icon - Divest Processing

Divest Processing

Tracks the time passengers spend preparing items before screening.

Icon - Lane Utilisation

Lane Utilisation

Shows how actively each processing lane is used throughout operations.

Airport Solutions for Security Checkpoint

Small Security Checkpoints

Starting at

$9,000

Approx. 100 - 300m2

  • Typical throughput: Up to ~3 million passengers/year
  • 2-4 manual lanes and 1-2 priority lanes
  • Single queuing zone, minimal lane separation
  • Around 6–10 sensors covering lanes and queue entry/exit points
Small Airports

Medium‑Sized Security Zones

Starting at

$18,000

Approx. 300–1,000m2

  • Typical throughput: 3–15 million passengers/year
  • 6-16 security lanes with priority and crew lanes
  • Staff presence vs lane performance
  • Requires around 15 devices depending on ceiling height and layout complexity
Medium-Sized Airports

Large International Checkpoint Solution

Starting at

$28,000

Approx. 800-2,500m2 (or above)

  • Typical throughput: > 15–40+ million passengers/year
  • 16–32+ security lanes, including:
  • Priority, transfer, crew, PRM & staff lanes
  • Multiple divest islands & screening areas
  • Typically 25–40 devices, optimised per lane cluster and height profile
Large International Airports

Case Study

Early Arrival Insight
Staffing Load Optimised
Hidden Stoppage Detection

Early Arrival Insight

Case Study 1

Identifying Early Passenger Arrival as the Root Cause

Context

Large European hub airport (35M pax/year) experiencing repeated complaints about long waiting times at two reclaim belts during evening wide-body arrivals.

Challenge

The airport experienced recurring complaints about long waiting times at two reclaim belts during wide-body evening arrivals. Ground handling insisted baggage delivery was on time.

Action Using the System

The Operational Review dashboard revealed passengers were reaching the hall 6–9 minutes earlier than the model baseline due to short walking routes and smooth immigration clearance.

Outcome

  • Ground handling was cleared of blame; complaint escalations ceased.
  • Airport updated staff positioning at the hall to manage early passenger surges.
  • “Unexplained delays” dropped by over 60% because root causes became clear.

Immediate Value

Clear operational transparency and quick resolution of root-cause disputes.

Staffing Load Optimised

Case Study 2

Reducing Over-Staffing During Low-Load Waves

Context

Medium-sized Southeast Asian airport (18M pax/year) with historically conservative staffing in reclaim halls.

Challenge

The airport historically staffed reclaim halls conservatively, leading to high labour cost during quiet mid-day periods.

Action Using the System

The Staffing Planner heatmap revealed repeated over-staffed windows (index > 1.20) from 11:00–14:00 across all terminals.

Outcome

  • Rosters were adjusted to reassign two handlers per shift.
  • No reduction in SLA performance or congestion.
  • Annualised manpower savings of 8–10% across reclaim operations.

Immediate Value

Measurable cost improvement without degrading passenger experience.

Hidden Stoppage Detection

Case Study 3

Detecting Hidden Belt Stoppages Impacting SLA

Context

A major Middle Eastern hub (40M pax/year) noted recurring first-bag SLA breaches for certain airlines.

Challenge

Airlines claimed normal offload times, yet first-bag delivery was consistently 5–7 minutes late, and staff could not visually identify the cause.

Action Using the System

The system detected short, repeated belt stoppages (20–40 seconds each) caused by a worn motor component. These stoppages were too small to be noticed visually by staff.

Outcome

  • Maintenance replaced components proactively.
  • First-bag SLA compliance improved from 82% → 94% within one week.
  • Better relationships with airlines due to factual RCA.

Immediate Value

Equipment issues surfaced quickly, preventing recurring SLA failures.